An Essential Summary of Our Book of Church Order (Presbyterian Church in America)

Our denomination has a book that governs the operation of our church on all levels. Personally, I think it is probably too long and complicated, even though I agree with the principles in it. I think we would be better served to simply have something like the following. This is a summary of our Book of Church Order that I use to give a simple explanation of what I believe are all the key points of the book.

The System of Government of the Church

Church Government:

  1. Jesus Christ is the King and Head of the Church. He defines the doctrine, government, discipline, worship, and ethics of the Church.
  2. The visible church consists of all who profess faith in Christ, together with their children.
  3. Believers are ordinarily called to belong to particular local churches.
  4. A local church is a community of professing believers and their children who gather for worship, mutual edification, pastoral oversight, and the advancement of the gospel.
  5. The power of the church is spiritual, ministerial, and declarative: the church may proclaim, administer, and enforce the law of Christ, but it may not bind the conscience apart from Scripture.
  6. The official leadership of the church consists of elders and deacons.
  7. Elders govern, teach, oversee, and shepherd the church. Some elders are called and trained especially for the ministry of Word and Sacrament and are called teaching elders or ministers.
  8. Deacons serve the church by caring for those in need, encouraging liberality, receiving and distributing gifts, and caring for the property of the congregation under the oversight of the Session.
  9. Churches should live in connection with one another for mutual accountability, common government, and shared ministry. In Presbyterian government, this connection is expressed regionally in presbyteries and nationally in the General Assembly.
  10. Elders govern the church jointly in courts. These courts are the Session for the local church, the Presbytery for the regional church, and the General Assembly for the whole denomination.
  11. Church courts are not independent tribunals but are related to one another, with lower courts subject to the review and control of higher courts.
  12. No one may simply take office in the church by his own choosing; officers must be lawfully called, examined, elected or approved, ordained, and installed.
  13. Ordination is the solemn setting apart of a qualified man to church office by prayer and the laying on of hands.
  14. Pastors are called by congregations and examined, ordained, and installed by presbyteries; ruling elders and deacons are elected by congregations and examined, ordained, and installed by Sessions.
  15. The official relationship between a pastor and a congregation may be dissolved only through the proper action of the congregation and Presbytery.
  16. The congregation does not govern as a church court, but it exercises important powers, especially in electing officers, calling pastors, approving major property matters, and giving counsel or consent where the BCO requires it.

Church Discipline:

  1. The purpose of discipline is to glorify God, preserve the purity and peace of the church, build up the congregation, and seek the spiritual good of the person under discipline.
  2. Discipline includes both the church’s general pastoral oversight of its members and the narrower judicial process used when an offense must be formally adjudicated.
  3. An offense is something in the doctrine or practice of a church member that is contrary to the Word of God and can be proved from Scripture.
  4. The governing body with jurisdiction over a member or minister may inquire into any matter that could bring scandal or injury to the church.
  5. Individuals may seek to resolve issues through church courts, but they must ordinarily first seek to win their brother.
  6. When a matter cannot be resolved informally, the governing body may enter judicial process through careful inquiry, charges, evidence, and judgment.
  7. When formal charges are brought, the accused must answer the charge; if he confesses guilt, the court may proceed to judgment and impose an appropriate censure, but if he denies guilt, the court must conduct a trial.
  8. A trial ordinarily proceeds by reading the charge, hearing the accused’s answer, examining the witnesses for both sides, hearing the parties’ arguments, deliberating, voting, announcing the verdict, and entering judgment.
  9. If the court finds the person guilty, it may impose a censure: admonition, suspension from the Lord’s Supper, suspension from office, deposition from office, or excommunication.
  10. If someone comes and confesses, the court may impose a censure, but it must be clear that the person intends to confess for that judicial purpose.
  11. Some matters may be handled without process, such as certain removals from office, transfers, withdrawals, or erasures from the roll, but these are still acts of pastoral discipline.
  12. If someone attempts to remove himself from the church, the court should warn him of the spiritual consequences and seek to dissuade him; in some cases, the court may retain jurisdiction and proceed.
  13. The proceedings of lower courts come under higher courts by review and control, reference, appeal, and complaint.
  14. A complaint challenges an act or decision of a court, but once judicial process has begun, objections in the case are preserved for appeal rather than handled by complaint.
  15. If a complaint or appeal is rejected or decided adversely, the matter may be carried to the next higher court according to the BCO.

Understanding God’s Compassion for All . . . And Our Own

One of the most persistent questions in theology is this: how do we bring together God’s sincere compassion for all sinners and His decision to save only some of them?

Scripture presents this to us in at least three ways. First, there are God’s indiscriminate offers of mercy to all. Second, there are declarations of His love for the world, such as John 3:16. Third, there are passages that speak of God’s compassion toward those who are never saved. These seem to pull in different directions. Either God does not truly have compassion for all, or He has compassion but cannot act on it.

This is not a minor difficulty. As A. A. Hodge noted, it is one of the strongest points pressed by Arminians against Calvinists. Robert Lewis Dabney also recognized that Calvinists have often struggled here. Because of that, he believed that this issue deserved another look.

Nor is this just a theoretical issue. When we look at any person and have compassion, we may ask, “Does God stand behind this compassion?”

Dabney offered a solution to this perplexing question in his article, “God’s Indiscriminate Proposals of Mercy: As Related to His Power, Wisdom, and Sincerity.” But his real contribution, I would suggest, lies deeper than he himself fully realized. He did not so much introduce a new principle as expose one already at work—and show how it ought to be applied more consistently.

The Problem: Collapsing Affection into Action
The difficulty arises from an assumption that feels intuitive but is false:

If an affection is real, one must act on it.

If God truly has compassion, then He must relieve the misery. If He does not relieve it, then compassion must not be there.

This assumption drives both sides:

  • The Arminian says: if God has compassion, He must act—so something must limit His action.
  • Some Calvinists reply: since God does not act, the compassion must not exist in that case.

Both accept the same premise. Both are mistaken.

What is needed is not a new theological distinction, but a clearer understanding of the structure of rational agency itself. Continue reading “Understanding God’s Compassion for All . . . And Our Own”

Leadership That Actually Moves People Forward

Most of us default to a kind of leadership that doesn’t really work.

We see something we don’t like in people—a child, a team, a church—and we react. We correct, criticize, withdraw, or push harder. It feels like leadership because we are doing something. But it often produces about as much growth as a sixth-grade teacher hitting a student for not knowing a geometry answer. It may express frustration, but it does not create understanding or movement.

This is leadership by reaction. It is common, instinctive, and largely ineffective.

There is a better way.

Leadership Begins with Vision
Effective leadership begins not with what is wrong, but with a clear sense of what could and should be. It asks: where are we going?

Without that, everything else is noise. You may push people, but you are not leading them anywhere.

Consider the contrast. You can react to kids spending too much time on screens, or you can envision a better alternative and work toward it. You can react to injustice, or you can articulate a vision of a different kind of community and pursue it.

This is what distinguishes reactive leadership from visionary leadership. The latter begins with clarity about the destination and then works backward to the means.

If someone said to you, “I want to become exactly what you think I should be—what does that look like?”, could you answer? If not, you are not ready to lead them there.

Clarity requires work. Reflection. Conversation. Prayer. Writing. Thinking. But without it, leadership collapses into reaction.

Vision Reveals the Path
Once the destination is clear, the path begins to emerge.

You cannot meaningfully answer the question “How do we get there?” until you can answer “Where is there?”

When you do, practical steps start to take shape. Continue reading “Leadership That Actually Moves People Forward”

Our Part & God’s Part in Our Sanctification/Transformation

Power to Change
How do we become what God has made us to become? Can we become what we are supposed to become? Can we fulfill our potential? Can we become joyful, content, and just people instead of angry, frustrated, and selfish people?

The Christian faith answers honestly: on our own, we cannot. Left to ourselves, we are stuck. But it also gives us remarkable hope. The same power by which God raised Jesus from the dead is at work in us, enabling us to become what God has called us to be.

This raises an obvious question. If that is true, why are so many Christians still angry, anxious, materialistic, and even mean? Continue reading “Our Part & God’s Part in Our Sanctification/Transformation”

The Cardinal Virtues for the Christian Life, Part 5: Resolute Endurance (Fortitude)

In the 1920s, Clarence Keith wanted to leave the United States and serve as a missionary in South Africa. In those days, you had to mail in paperwork, get visas approved, and hope everything turned out alright when you arrived at the boat (not the plane!) to cross the ocean.

Clarence arrived in New York a couple of days before his departure, but the visa was not ready. The trip was cancelled. He returned to his home in southern Indiana to contemplate his next steps.

Roberta McMillan had attended God’s School of the Bible at the same time as Clarence. She also applied to be a missionary. She was refused because the organization did not want to send her as a single woman.

She also returned home to contemplate her next steps.

When you want to do something big in the world, setbacks and opposition are inevitable. What will you do when you hit a wall?

To keep going forward, you need resolute endurance. That’s the fourth cardinal virtue. It is sometimes called fortitude or courage. It is the ability to keep going and continue doing good when things get hard.

How the Bible Describes This
Resolute endurance is a common theme in the Bible. In living the Christian life and seeking to do good works, you will face opposition. You need the strength of endurance to keep going.

Jesus is the model here. He set before Himself a great goal: the redemption of the world. That mission meant opposition and the cross (Heb. 12:1–3). We are to consider His example and prepare ourselves to follow it.

One word the Bible uses for this virtue is patience. People develop at different rates, process things differently, and sometimes oppose us. The Apostle Paul encouraged the Thessalonians to recognize these differences and respond wisely. He said, “warn those who are idle and disruptive, encourage the disheartened, help the weak . . .” (1 Thess. 5:14). But then he added a universal command: “be patient with all.”

Getting people to work together takes patience. That is the fourth virtue applied to ordinary relationships.

Another biblical word for this virtue is perseverance. It refers to our ability to keep doing good in the face of opposition.

Jesus said, “Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you” (Luke 6:27).

Some people hear this as a reaction: wait until someone harms you, then try to do them good. But I think Jesus intends something deeper: do as much good as you can, and don’t let the evil actions of others deter you from continuing to do good—even toward those who wrong you.

Paul captured this beautifully: “Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good” (Rom. 12:21).

That is the principle. Keep doing good no matter what.

Why? To let evil triumph? No. Ultimately, to overcome it with good.

This is where hope comes in. Hope is the oxygen of resolute endurance.

The Need for Hope
Consider Jesus again. What kept Him going?

A vision of the good: “For the joy set before him he endured the cross, scorning its shame, and sat down at the right hand of the throne of God” (Heb. 12:2).

We do not endure suffering for suffering’s sake. We endure suffering for the sake of the good.

How can we have hope? Let’s consider the hope we have for ourselves and the hope we can have for the good we seek to do in the world.

First, what hope do we have for ourselves when we face hardship? That God will turn it for our good.

The Apostle Paul explains this promise: “And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him” (Romans 8:28).

Some people hear this and think: God will bring good out of this, but we do not know what that good is. While it is true we cannot see everything God is doing, Paul actually tells us what that good is: “For those God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son . . .” (Rom. 8:29).

The good that God is working in His people is transformation—making them more like Jesus.

This purpose gives us hope when life is hard. In fact, it allows us to rejoice even in suffering.

Earlier in Romans, Paul wrote: “Not only so, but we also glory in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope” (Rom. 5:3–4).

This is something people already know from experience: going through hard things can make you stronger. You grow. You learn.

That is Paul’s point. The greatest heroes pass through the greatest trials. Great threats often produce great victories.

But in this case, victory is not uncertain. In Christ, it is assured. That is why there is real hope.

What about the good we seek to do in the world? Can we hope that our efforts will matter?

Yes.

Paul explains the principle this way: “Let us not become weary in doing good, for at the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up” (Gal. 6:9).

This promise does not refer only to individual growth. It refers to the good we do for others.

Paul continues: “Therefore, as we have opportunity, let us do good to all people, especially to those who belong to the family of believers” (Gal. 6:10).

Doing good is not only good in itself. It also produces results. It makes an impact.

This is the vision we must keep before us when we encounter setbacks. Continuing to pursue the good will be good for us, good for others, and bring glory to God.

The Resolute Endurance of Clarence & Roberta
Clarence Keith and Roberta McMillan shared their experiences with each other through letters. Over time, they came to a conclusion.

They should go to the mission field—and they should go together as husband and wife.

About a year after their initial setback, they set off by boat for what was then Swaziland. They made the difficult journey to this landlocked nation and began a mission.

They carried sweet potatoes and biltong (a form of beef jerky) into the bush on long treks and shared the Gospel.

They raised children—eight of them, in fact. They milked cows and later had their children help milk them to provide milk for the family. They raised their own food. They ordered clothing patterns from the Sears catalogue and made clothes for their children.

Decades later, God called them to another mission in what was then Southern Rhodesia. God provided funds for a medical mission that is still operating today in what is now Zambia.

What if they had given up?

None of that good would have been done.

They could have enjoyed a comfortable life in America, no doubt. But the greater good would have remained undone.

I also would not be here, because they are my great-grandparents.

In 2014, I preached a sermon on legacy to more than 100 descendants and spouses of Clarence and Roberta.

That moment has remained a constant reminder: do not give up—even when life is hard, even when obstacles appear.

It is a living testimony to God’s promise: we shall reap, if we faint not.