Author: Wes White

Many people know the great Carthaginian General Hannibal. He took his elephants across the Alps from Spain to invade Rome and Italy during the 2nd Punic War (218–201 BC, the Punic Wars were a series of three wars between Rome and Carthage). This famous act memorializes Hannibal’s military prowess.

But less have heard of the man who defeated Hannibal: Scipio Africanus, Publius Cornelius Scipio (236–183). Scipio not only defeated Hannibal, he never lost a battle. He was Rome’s greatest general.

Seeing that Scipio’s rise was connected with the threat of Hannibal, it made me wonder, would there have been a Scipio without a Hannibal?

I tied that question into a larger question I had been pondering related to the Roman Empire. Carthage was Rome’s most formidable enemy. It was a vibrant and wealthy empire that controlled much of the Western Mediterranean outside of Italy. It’s easy to speculate, what would have happened if Carthage had won the war? Would there have been a Roman Empire?

But my question was a little bit different. It was this: without Carthage, would there have been a Roman Empire? Without this powerful opponent, would Rome have remained content as a land power in Italy?

Military historian Richard A. Gabriel’s book Scipio Africanus demonstrates that these two questions are interrelated to a much greater degree than I would have initially expected. According to Gabriel, Hannibal’s success allowed Scipio to arise, and it was Scipio who developed the idea of an empire as away of solving the long-term security threat posed by Carthage.

Here’s how it happened.

Hannibal was a great general, but Carthage had great generals. They had well-developed tactics, and they knew how to use their diverse armies as a tool of their will. Hannibal was simply the most capable and daring of these generals.

Hannibal dealt Rome its greatest defeat at the Battle of Cannae. There, Rome lost 80% of the soldiers who participated in that battle. However, this was merely one of many defeats that Hannibal inflicted on Rome. Hannibal remained in Italy as a threat to Rome for 14 years!

Rome could not defeat Hannibal in pitched battle, so several Roman strategists believed that the way to defeat him was to attack his base in Africa. Scipio is credited with this strategy, but he was not the only one to think of it. He was, however, the one who actually successfully carried it out.

When the 2nd Punic War started, Scipio was a junior cavalry officer. He did come from a prominent Roman family, but he advanced quickly because he actually survived and lived and so many of the officers above him died. Scipio’s own father was commander of the Roman forces in Spain, and he died fighting Hannibal’s brother Hasdrubal at Battle of the Upper Baetis.

Scipio was chosen to replace his own father as commander of the Roman forces in Spain. Scipio eventually defeated the Carthaginian forces in Spain and began planning the invasion of Africa. Beyond that, he began working to implement a broader vision. As Gabriel explains:

Scipio’s grand strategic vision was based in the new Roman class that looked to overseas expansion and commerce for Rome’s future. In Scipio’s view, Carthage’s predations in Spain and Sicily were forcing Rome to become a world power for it was the only way in which its legitimate security interests could be satisfied (140).

But he first had to defeat Carthage.

Scipio’s Africa strategy worked. The threat to the city of Carthage led to Hannibal’s recall. At the Battle of Zama, Scipio defeated Hannibal and quickly brought an end to the 2nd Punic War.

Following the war, Rome established its rule over Spain and other areas of the Western Mediterranean. Scipio established the first of Rome’s overseas colony cities: Italica. It was the first of the many Roman colonies that would spread throughout the Mediterranean world. From this one city came three emperors: Trajan, Hadrian, and Theodosius the Great (Gabriel, 138). Even though Rome was a republic at this time, this was the real beginning of Roman empire.

So, why does all this matter? When we consider large and difficult challenges, it’s easy to get discouraged. However, these sometimes scary things test us and enable us to grow. We should not seek out powerful enemies, but when we face them, we should be less daunted. Big challenges can defeat us, but they also present the biggest opportunities for growth.